http://www.photoported.com/image-stabilization-in-digital-cameras-lens-or-body-based/ Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:20:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.photoported.com/image-stabilization-in-digital-cameras-lens-or-body-based/comment-page-1/#comment-5622 Balaji Bharadwaj Sun, 20 Feb 2011 10:20:42 +0000 #comment-5622 Sir I am planning to buy a Canon 1000D DSLR. I want to know if the 18-55mm lens needs to be an IS (because I will often be using it indoors too - like family get-togethers - or will increasing the ISO - a 'pseudo-stabilistaion' still do the trick?) As a rule - doubling the ISO (say from 100 to 200) helps to double the shutter speed right (say from 1/100 to 1/200). Will the increased graininess be evident on a 21" screen? Secondly, how much more important is it to have a IS on a telephoto lens? I am an amateur and have multipurpose use for it (from home get-togethers to travels to various cities and shooting buildings, portraits in these situations) and want just 2 lenses. Sir
I am planning to buy a Canon 1000D DSLR. I want to know if the 18-55mm lens needs to be an IS (because I will often be using it indoors too – like family get-togethers – or will increasing the ISO – a ‘pseudo-stabilistaion’ still do the trick?) As a rule – doubling the ISO (say from 100 to 200) helps to double the shutter speed right (say from 1/100 to 1/200). Will the increased graininess be evident on a 21″ screen?
Secondly, how much more important is it to have a IS on a telephoto lens?
I am an amateur and have multipurpose use for it (from home get-togethers to travels to various cities and shooting buildings, portraits in these situations) and want just 2 lenses.

]]>